Current:Home > ScamsFormat of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents -InvestTomorrow
Format of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents
View
Date:2025-04-13 15:50:55
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Opponents of the Dakota Access oil pipeline are taking issue with the format of private oral testimony in meetings for public comment on a draft environmental review of the controversial pipeline.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is in the midst of two public comment meetings in Bismarck, North Dakota, the first held Wednesday, the second set for Thursday. People wishing to give testimony may do so orally in a curtained area with a stenographer, or do so in writing at tables.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has long opposed the pipeline due to the risk of an oil spill contaminating the tribe’s drinking water supply. The four-state pipeline crosses under the Missouri River just upstream of the tribe’s reservation.
The long-awaited draft environmental review, released in September, outlines five options for the pipeline’s fate. Those include denying the easement for the controversial crossing and removing or abandoning a 7,500-foot (2,286-meter) segment, or granting the easement with no changes or with additional safety measures. A fifth option is to reroute the pipeline north of Bismarck, which would require new state, local and federal permits.
Many opponents of the pipeline had hoped Wednesday’s meeting would have allowed them to publicly question the Corps and pipeline developer Energy Transfer, The Bismarck Tribune reported.
Joe Lafferty, a Native American activist who opposes the pipeline, poured oil and water into a cup and challenged Corps officials to take a drink.
“If it means so much to you, I want you, DAPL, Army Corps of Engineers, drink this water with oil in it and then maybe, as a Lakota I’ll consider your request,” Lafferty said. His demonstration did not count as official testimony.
Republican state Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring, who sits on a state panel that regulates oil and gas, said the meeting was a fair process.
“I heard a comment saying, ‘This is no democratic way’ -- why, I think it very much is because you get a chance to say your piece,” he said.
About 150 to 200 people attended Wednesday’s meeting, Corps spokesperson Steve Wolf told The Associated Press. About 80 people gave oral testimony, taken down by two stenographers, which Wolf said enabled the Corps to receive more comments. The Corps received about 50 written comments.
“I understand the fact that some people want to be performative and try to create some kind of a fanfare in front of an audience of people, but that’s not the spirit and intent of the law or the meeting,” Wolf told the AP. The Corps is “absolutely on the right side of the law in how we’re doing this,” he said.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairwoman Janet Alkire last month called for the draft review to be invalidated, with a new one begun and the pipeline shut down.
A virtual meeting with only tribes is set for Nov. 8. The public comment meetings should be held on the reservation, said Peter Capossela, one of Standing Rock’s attorneys. The Bismarck meetings are more convenient for corporate executives and state officials than for tribal members who live as far as 120 miles (190 kilometers) away, he said.
“If the Army Corps is genuinely interested in hearing the views of tribal members and learning about the potential environmental impacts of an oil spill at the DAPL/Lake Oahe crossing, it would have held public hearings on the reservation that’s going to be polluted by a spill,” Capossela told the AP.
Wolf said the Corps is “being as open and transparent as we can possibly be through all of this, and nobody is being excluded from anything by us.”
State government and oil industry leaders view the pipeline as crucial infrastructure and the safest method for transporting oil, rather than by rail. Officials such as North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and U.S. Sen. John Hoeven have said they prefer the pipeline to continue operating as it has.
The public comment period ends Dec. 13. A final decision whether to grant or deny the easement is expected in late 2024.
veryGood! (313)
Related
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Astrology's 'Big Three': What your sun, moon and rising sign say about you
- USA men's volleyball stays unbeaten with quarterfinal win over Brazil
- Chappell Roan may have made history at Lollapalooza with 'biggest set of all time'
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 index soars more than 10% after plunging a day earlier
- Horoscopes Today, August 6, 2024
- 'Billions' and 'David Makes Man' actor Akili McDowell, 21, charged with murder
- Sam Taylor
- Possible small tornado sweeps into Buffalo, damaging buildings and scattering tree limbs
Ranking
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- 'Could've been an email': House of the Dragon finale leaves fans wanting more
- Simone Biles’ greatness is summed up in one photo — but not the one you think
- Heatstroke death of Baltimore worker during trash collection prompts calls for workplace safety
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Social media pays tribute to the viral Montgomery brawl on one year anniversary
- Democratic primary in Arizona’s 3rd District is too close to call, AP determines
- Oakland A’s to sell stake in Coliseum to local Black development group
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Army offering $10K reward for information on missing 19-year-old pregnant woman
911 operator calmly walks expectant mom through a surprise at-home delivery
3rd set of remains with bullet wounds found with possible ties to 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre
Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
Gunmen kill New Zealand helicopter pilot in another attack in Indonesia’s restive Papua region
Buca di Beppo files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after closing several locations
Maine denies initial request of Bucksport-area owner to give up dams